Working for responsible management of public land grazing

Ideas for Reforming National Forest Grazing

Felice Pace, Grazing Chair, Redwood Chapter SC and Coordinator, Project to Reform Public Land Grazing

These ideas are aimed to stimulate thinking within Sierra Club and other public land activist networks about what might be accomplished to reform National Forest Grazing, both

Ideas for Reforming National Forest Grazing

June 2020

Felice Pace

Coordinator, Grazing Reform Project and

Grazing Chair, Redwood Chapter of the Sierra Club

The Grazing Reform Project supports the elimination of non-native livestock grazing from all national forest and BLM lands, especially from designated wilderness. In our view, grazing exotic livestock on western public lands inevitably results in degradation of water quality, riparian areas and wetlands and damages other public land uses, like recreation, which generate more economic benefits as compared to livestock grazing. We also recognize that livestock grazing was established on some of those lands before the national forests were created. We support buy-out of grazing permits from willing sellers as proposed in legislation pending in Congress.

We also recognize that the nation is a long way from eliminating public land grazing. Until that day comes, we believe it is critical that public land grazing is managed responsibly and that means requiring implementation of modern grazing management strategies and techniques. Modern grazing management uses regular herding to move livestock out of riparian areas and wetlands and to rotate grazing among the various pastures found on each grazing allotment. Unfortunately, Forest Service and BLM managers often do not require modern grazing management. Instead they too often allow grazing permit holders to release their livestock onto public land and not return to manage those livestock until it is time to take them back to the home ranch.

The lack of modern, active grazing management is known as passive, season-long grazing. It directly results in degradation of water quality, riparian areas and wetlands and damages wildlife habitat. Those impacts can be reduced by implementing modern, active grazing management.

This paper describes changes in Forest Service and BLM policies, procedures and direction which can be required via administrative agency action or legislation. The ideas are aimed to stimulate thinking about what might be accomplished to reform National Forest Grazing, both administratively and via legislation, with a new administration and new Congress in 2021. Some of the suggestions also apply to grazing on federal lands administered by the US Bureau of Land Management. My hope is that there can be a process within public land conservation and advocacy networks leading up to January 2021 which is focused on and ready to push for public land grazing reforms if conditions are favorable.

These ideas are informed by ten years monitoring grazing management on the ground in Northern California and Southern Oregon and using that monitoring to advocate for on-the-ground grazing management reforms. Our Allotment Monitoring Reports, other reports, advocacy actions and lots more can be found on our website: www.grazingreform.org.

Administrative Reforms

While some administrative reforms require rule-making or other processes, most can be implemented by direction from the Chief of the Forest Service. These days with each new administration we get a new Chief. A new Chief should be encouraged to issue a directive or directives requiring modern, active management of all national forest grazing allotments, including the following elements.

  1. National Forest Service Core BMPs require site specific BMPs for grazing allotments and the use of Annual Operating Instructions (AOIs) to permit holders to implement the BMPs once NEPA has been completed. But completion of NEPA for grazing reauthorization has slowed to a crawl. Some Forest Service units are not implementing the agency’s own BMPs and they can not be compelled to do so by the courts. Direction from the FS Chief (or USDA Under Secretary) would instruct responsible federal officials (district rangers) to develop site specific BMPs and to implement them via AOIs whether or not NEPA has been completed.
  1. Require that district rangers, the federal officials who are responsible for managing Forest Service grazing allotments, permanently close and abolish any and all national forest grazing allotments which are at the time of promulgation or in the future “vacant” for five years or more.
  1. Instruct all district rangers to reassess by time certain the amount of forage on each allotment that is available for consumption, what is needed to support the native ungulates which use each allotment and to adjust the number of livestock permitted to graze allotments (“stocking”) via Annual Operating Instructions in order to provide adequate forage for native grazers. In assessing forage availability, require that district rangers utilize methods that measure what is actually there and not what is theoretically available.
  1. When completing environmental analysis for grazing allotments, require calculation of forage available for grazing based on actual conditions and data, adjusted for the amount of forage needed to provide for native grazers. In completing those calculations, consult with State Fish and Wildlife agencies.
  1. Require implementation of Multiple Indicator Monitoring (MIM) to the BLM Protocol on all riparian areas on all national forest and BLM grazing allotments.
  1. Require that district rangers implement modern, rest-rotation grazing on all allotments in order to reduce impacts to water quality, riparian areas and wetlands.
  2. Instruct agency managers to rest from all grazing any allotment which does not meet riparian and water quality standards for two successive years. The rest from grazing should continue for the amount of time needed to restore riparian areas and wetlands to full and proper functioning and to meet applicable state and federal water quality standards.

Legislative Reform:

A. The Standard Legislative Process:

1. For a variety of reasons, including not wanting to rile congressional grazing supporters, the Forest Service refuses to actually close allotments even when they have been “vacant” for many years, are not good allotments in terms of forage availability, are unwanted by any ranchers and unlikely to be wanted anytime in the future. Therefore, it would be good to have legislation that requires the FS to permanently close any grazing allotment that has been “vacant” for five years or more. Even better, Congress could mandate that any national forest grazing allotment that is “vacant’ for five years or more is automatically and permanently closed. That would effectively phase out grazing over time on national forest land.

2. In the 1995 Rescission Bill (Public Law 104-19) Congress gave the FS authorization to reissue ten year term grazing permits even if environmental review has not been completed. That has resulted in FS completing fewer and fewer grazing EAs every year since then. This is documented in FS Rescission Act Reports to Congress. In 2016, for example, Regions 4, 8 and 9 did no grazing NEPA; Region 5, California, did one. It would be good to get language into legislation, or into an annual appropriation bill, rescinding the Rescission Bill language or prohibiting the FS from issuing a grazing permit unless environmental review of the decision has been completed within the past five years.

3. There have been a number of provisions added to wilderness bills or within proposed wilderness bills that allow grazing permit holders to use motorized equipment inside designated wilderness to maintain “improvements”. It would be good to have a section added to a larger wilderness bill specifying that, not withstanding those provisions, management agencies should approve motorized use only where there is no feasible non-motorized alternative.

B. The Federal Appropriations Process:

Many but not all of what can be accomplished via the standard legislative process can also be accomplished via language inserted into the annual bills which provide funding to the Forest Service and BLM. For example, language can be added to appropriations bills that:

  • Mandates implementing inter-agency Multiple-Indicator Monitoring (MIM) on all grazing allotments.
  • Instructs agency grazing managers to implement modern rest-rotation grazing on all allotments in order to reduce impacts to water quality and riparian areas.
  • Instructs agency managers to rest from grazing any allotment which does not meet riparian and water quality standards for two successive years. The period of rest should be for the amount of time needed to restore riparian areas, wetland functioning and water quality to standard.
  • Reversing the Appropriations language that gave FS managers the ability to issue new 10 year grazing permits even if NEPA review had not been completed. The new language would require new NEPA review and and a new decision, and the implementation of modern grazing management practices like rest-rotation grazing, before a new or renewed grazing permit can be issued.

Provisions added to appropriations bills can be designed to apply from thence onward; they do not need to be renewed each Appropriations Cycle. What is required in order to get such language added to an Appropriations Bill, however, is participating in the entire Appropriations Process and securing a champion on the proper Appropriations sub-committee who has the power to get bill language added.

C. Replacing House Report 96-617:

Adopted in 1980 during passage of a wilderness bill for Colorado, House Report 96-617 has been interpreted as preventing any reduction in the amount of grazing allowed within designated wilderness, allowing grazing permit holders to use motor vehicles for non-emergency and routine management practices and allowing permit holders to reconstruct cabins and other facilities incompatible with wilderness. Congress should amend of replace the Report to limit conditions under which motor vehicle use, structures like cabins, fencing and other installations incompatible with wilderness are allowed. Further, Congress should make it clear that agencies can reduce the number of livestock permitted to graze and require other grazing management changes within wilderness to protect the natural values found there.




Click Here to Download this Document

Click Here to Access the Project’s Advocacy Archives

OUR SPONSORS

OUR SPONSORS

Scroll to Top